Crisis communication // reputation // stakeholder care

When it has to be fast and still be right

In a crisis the worst decision is almost always the reflexive one: saying something too quickly that has to be withdrawn, or staying silent until others tell the story. I have worked on customer win-back in automotive, on a brand transition in retail chains and on a reputation case in chain restaurants.

See the method Contact

Starting point

A crisis is rarely a communication problem

It only becomes visible there. What looks like a communication failure from outside is usually a process that reported too late, a responsibility that was not staffed at the weekend, or a decision nobody wanted to explain externally because it had never been explained internally.

So I do not start with the press release but with the question of who knew what and when, and who actually decides. Only then can a statement be written that still holds up in three weeks. A formulation that has to be corrected later does more damage than the original incident.

Method

Four phases, a clear order

Establish the facts. What is confirmed, what is assumption, who is affected, how fast is it spreading? Nothing is published in this phase, but everything is prepared.
Inside first, then outside. The workforce hears it first, and completely enough to answer questions from friends and family. People who learn about their employer from the news do not defend it.
Say what holds. A first statement with what is confirmed, what is being done and when there will be an update. No conditional, no blame, no number that is still moving.
Clear up afterwards. Attention ends within days, search results remain. Do nothing after the crisis and you will find the incident on page one years later.

Cases

Where I learned this

Daimler AG // Global Services and Parts // 2012 to 2020

Coming Home: winning back customers who buy elsewhere

A growing share of spare parts was no longer bought from the manufacturer but as replicas or through unlicensed channels. That is more than a revenue issue: with safety-relevant parts, liability, warranty and ultimately trust in the brand are at stake. At the same time, nobody is won back by being told they are buying from the wrong source. Coming Home therefore worked through demonstrating the difference rather than wagging a finger: making visible what defines an original part, and making the way back to the authorised workshop as easy as possible. Across eight years, in an internationally rolled-out programme.

My part: concept, creative work and the design of the relaunch concept itself, plus visual, screen and motion design. As a freelance visual designer via alt/cramer change factory.

Retail chain // brand alignment // 2013 to 2014

Preparing a brand from the inside

Before an established retail brand name can be replaced, the organisation behind it has to already be the new brand. Otherwise only the sign changes. At Dänisches Bettenlager, which was already called JYSK in other markets, the work therefore happened years before the public renaming and almost entirely on the inside: aligning the product range with the international standard, building an information architecture that brought range, stores and responsibilities into one shared order, employee magazines showing who works on what in which store, plus motivation and apprenticeship campaigns. On top of that, trust had to be rebuilt, internally and externally. Why that was necessary does not belong on this page; what it taught does: a workforce proud of its employer carries a brand further than any campaign.

My part: full art direction and information architecture, including the design of the relaunch concept itself. As a freelance visual designer via alt/cramer change factory.

German Institute for Standardization // intranet // 2012 to 2013

Order on the inside, for an organisation that defines order

The German Institute for Standardization defines how things are done consistently. Internally that does not follow automatically: in an organisation grown over decades, knowledge sits in pockets, and what the neighbouring department actually contributes is often unknown. The task was therefore not technical but communicative: internal communication, stakeholder care, and the motivation and standing of the organisation among its own people. The intranet became the backbone, a shared point of access for all employees, flanked by measures making each area's contribution visible. People who see what the others work on explain their own organisation better to the outside.

My part: art direction and information architecture. As a freelance visual designer via alt/cramer change factory.

Chain restaurants // reputation after an advertising failure

When the accusation is justified

A restaurant chain ran an advertisement whose wording demeaned a group of people. It was not a misunderstanding or an unfortunate turn of phrase but a statement meant exactly as it landed. The reaction was accordingly harsh and hit revenue immediately. The campaign was not ours, we came in afterwards. The first insight was the most uncomfortable one: where the accusation is justified, every explanation only prolongs the story. The only thing that helps is to acknowledge it and then do something that is not another campaign. The strategy therefore relied on verifiable substance rather than on communicating about the incident: organic sourcing, provenance and sustainability as genuinely changed practice, and only then communication about it. An apology works only when something follows that can be checked.

My part: developing the reputation strategy within the team at alt/cramer change factory.

These projects came about via alt/cramer change factory, where I worked as a freelance visual designer in concept, visual and screen design as well as motion design, designing the relaunch concepts themselves. Projects for the following clients date from the same period, confirmed by a reference letter from the agency which I provide on request.

Daimler AG Dänisches Bettenlager Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V. Heckler & Koch Burda KARSTADT Merlin Entertainment

Internal

The part almost everyone underestimates

In a brand change or a major transition the workforce is not the audience, it is the channel. Every person standing in a store explains the change twenty times a day, prepared or not. Prepared, the transition looks composed. Unprepared, the customer hears a sentence along the lines of: don't ask me, nobody tells us anything either.

Internal communication therefore does not mean a company-wide email but material people can work with: the reasoning in one sentence, answers to the five questions that actually come up, and a route for feedback from the stores to reach the top while something can still be changed.

Surroundings

Stakeholder care and value chains

A crisis never has just one audience. Customers, employees, suppliers, retail partners, banks, authorities, often relatives and neighbours too. Each group needs its own message, and the order decides whether someone feels overlooked.

The map

Who is affected, and when do they hear it

The stakeholder map belongs before the crisis, not inside it. Anyone still working out in the first hour who needs a call is calling too late.

The chain

Where the crisis lands next

A problem at a supplier becomes a problem for the brand on the product. Conversely, businesses that did nothing wrong depend on a brand in crisis. Knowing the chain means seeing the next damage sooner.

Afterwards

Reputation is visibility work

When the coverage ends, the real work begins: your own content ranking more strongly than the headline, so the incident gradually loses its place.

How that works technically

FAQ // crisis and reputation

Frequently asked questions about crisis communication

What belongs in the first hours of a crisis?

Three things, in this order. First secure the facts: what actually happened, who knows, how fast is it spreading? Second inform internally, before staff learn about it from the media, because employees who know nothing become a second crisis. Third a first public statement containing only what is confirmed. The most common mistake is a fast statement with unproven content that has to be withdrawn later.

Should you respond to a shitstorm at all?

That depends on whether the accusation is justified. If it is, silence is the most expensive option, because others will tell the story instead. If it is not, a factual correction beats a defence, because a defence prolongs the story. What never works: deleting comments, ridiculing the accusation, or threatening legal action while the matter is still public.

How long does it take for a reputation to recover?

Public attention usually fades within days, search results do not. An incident that generated coverage still sits on page one years later if nobody works on it. So crisis communication does not end with the last article, it ends with visibility work that gradually displaces the incident: your own content ranking more strongly than the headline.

What is stakeholder care?

The recognition that a crisis never has just one audience. Customers, employees, suppliers, retail partners, banks, authorities and, depending on the case, relatives are all affected. Each of these groups needs its own message at the right time, and the order matters: anyone who learns from the newspaper what concerns them rightly feels overlooked. Stakeholder care means having that map before the crisis rather than drawing it during one.

Why does the value chain matter in crisis communication?

Because many crises originate there and almost all of them land there. A problem at a supplier becomes a problem for the brand on the product. Conversely, businesses that did nothing wrong depend on a brand in crisis. Knowing the chain means knowing in advance where the next damage will occur, and addressing it before it becomes visible.

Is internal communication really that important?

It is the part most often underestimated. Every workforce is audience and spokesperson at once: people tell those around them what is going on at their company, and what they tell depends on what they know. In a brand change or a transition that alters daily work, internal communication decides whether the change looks composed or chaotic from the outside.

Do you also do this preventively, without an acute crisis?

That is the more sensible moment. Preparation means a stakeholder map, responsibilities and contact details, pre-drafted first statements for the likely scenarios, and approval paths that also work on a Sunday. It costs a few days and saves the hours you will not have during the crisis.

Something heading in this direction? Get in touch. I am open to projects and collaboration in this field.

Write to me